PDA

View Full Version : Bullied teen seeks solace in porn - News Shocker!!!!


Zebedee
February 8th, 2007, 08:16 AM
In possibly the worst piece of journalism of the year so far, there's even a fucking typo in the report, the BBC reach a new low in social concern.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6336509.stm

Read down to the bit about the kids you lazy fucks.

Zebedee
February 8th, 2007, 08:19 AM
Oh and today is the 13 anniversary of the best political death ever!!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/8/newsid_2538000/2538165.stm

Zelandra
February 8th, 2007, 08:21 AM
Wow....am I the only one that watches porn so I have something to jack it too? Honestly, how the fuck can you get addicted to porn? After enough masturbation I'm like "do not want".

dejaVu
February 8th, 2007, 10:39 AM
i just watched the pictures...

Will
February 8th, 2007, 10:54 AM
A world where it is ok (for our teenage sons and daughters) to watch someone's head being blown off but not ok to watch two chicks (or guys) pleasure each other is a world I must try to change.

Warning.......prepare for hexagonal conspiracy theory:

This is another move in a series of moves that will have us closer to a restricted internet where biometric id is required to access it.

The internet has been full of porn since the 90's (at least, that was when I started finding it). The only new twist with the internet is that it exposes what the mainstream media (i.e.: global corporations) wish to hide. That is why more and more you will see exposes covering the dangers our children face online. What better way to motivate us to give up a little more freedom then to threaten the well being of our children?

WiGgLr
February 8th, 2007, 10:57 AM
LOL Will, you can find conspiracy anywhere...

...it's an interesting thought though.

Will
February 8th, 2007, 11:52 AM
LOL Will, you can find conspiracy anywhere...

...it's an interesting thought though.

When two people plan something, without letting the rest of us know, you have a conspiracy on the go. (please check out these and other conspiricy rhymes at my website:

www.leftwingnutjobtinfoilisamusttoprotectmybrainfr omtheeviloftheilluminati.com (http://www.leftwingnutjobconspiricytinfoilisamusttoprotec tmybrainfromtheeviloftheilluminati.com)
(Disclaimer: might not be up and running atm)

Conspiracies are common yet theories are ostracized (not by you, just in general). It's as if everyone who bashes conspiracy theories believes that everything is transparent and nothing happens without the knowledge of the rest of us. I sort of miss that blissful feeling....sort of.

Will
February 8th, 2007, 12:09 PM
Comment: Pressure from all sides when it comes to the internet and controlling it.............




GOP revives ISP-tracking legislation

Published: February 6, 2007, 6:40 PM PST
http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/ne/hrds/talkbackred_15x13.gifTalkBack (http://news.com.com/GOP+revives+ISP-tracking+legislation/2100-1028_3-6156948.html#talkback) http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/ne/hrds/emailred_15x13.gifE-mail (http://news.com.com/2113-1028_3-6156948.html?tag=st.util.email) http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/ne/hrds/printred_15x13.gifPrint (http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6156948.html?tag=st.util.print) http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/ne05/fmwk/delicious_14x14.gifdel.icio.us (http://del.icio.us/post) http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/ne05/fmwk/digg_16x16.gifDigg this (http://digg.com/submit)

All Internet service providers would need to track their customers' online activities to aid police in future investigations under legislation introduced Tuesday as part of a Republican "law and order agenda."
Employees of any Internet provider who fail to store that information face fines and prison terms of up to one year, the bill says. The U.S. Justice Department could order the companies to store those records forever.
High Impact (http://news.com.com/2320-12359_3-0.html?tag=ne.st)

What's new:

Legislation introduced in Congress requires all Internet service providers to keep track of what their customers are doing online to aid police in future investigations.
Bottom line:

The bill--part of a Republican-led "law and order agenda"--echoes almost word for word a proposal made last year that never made it to a floor vote.
More stories on this topic (http://search.news.com/search?q=ISP+tracking)
http://adlog.com.com/adlog/i/r=10053&s=501815&t=2007.02.08.17.08.04&o=1023:1028:&h=cn&p=2&b=5&l=en_US&site=3&pt=2100&nd=1028&pid=&cid=6156948&pp=100&e=3&rqid=01c18-ad-e345B8DC5EDF9FF5D/http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/Ads/common/dotclear.gif

Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, called it a necessary anti-cybercrime measure. "The legislation introduced today will give law enforcement the tools it needs to find and prosecute criminals," he said in a statement.
A second requirement, also embedded in Smith's so-dubbed Safety Act (PDF) (http://www.politechbot.com/docs/smith.data.retention.labeling.draft.020607.pdf), requires owners of sexually explicit Web sites to post warning labels on their pages or face imprisonment. This echoes, nearly word for word, a proposal from last year (http://news.com.com/Web+labeling+mandate+surfaces+in+Senate/2100-1028_3-6083983.html) that was approved by a Senate committee but never made it to a floor vote (http://news.com.com/Congress+broadband+battles/2030-1028_3-6089332.html).
Even though both requirements are central to a Republican-led effort, neither data retention nor Web labeling are that partisan. A Senate committee approved a telecommunications bill (http://news.com.com/Senate+deals+blow+to+Net+neutrality/2100-1028_3-6089197.html) that included Web labeling by a 15-7 vote in June. And Rep. Diana DeGette, a Colorado Democrat, has been the most vocal proponent of data retention (http://news.com.com/Backer+of+ISP+snooping+slams+industry/2100-1028_3-6068339.html) in the entire Congress.
Other bills in the Republicans' "law and order" agenda (http://www.politechbot.com/docs/smith.gop.law.and.order.agenda.020607.doc) are related to terrorism, the death penalty, gangs, computer data breaches (http://news.com.com/Data+breach+bills+resurface+in+Congress/2100-7348_3-6156904.html) and drug trafficking.
ISP snooping timeline

In events that were first reported by CNET News.com, Bush administration officials have said Internet providers must keep track of what Americans are doing online. Here's the timeline:
June 2005 (http://news.com.com/Your+ISP+as+Net+watchdog/2100-1028_3-5748649.html): Justice Department officials quietly propose data retention rules.
December 2005 (http://news.com.com/Europe+passes+tough+new+data+retention+laws/2100-7350_3-5995089.html): European Parliament votes for data retention of up to two years.
April 14, 2006 (http://news.com.com/ISP+snooping+gaining+support/2100-1028_3-6061187.html): Data retention proposals surface in Colorado and the U.S. Congress.
April 20, 2006 (http://news.com.com/U.S.+attorney+general+calls+for+reasonable+data+re tention/2100-1030_3-6063185.html): Attorney General Alberto Gonzales says data retention "must be addressed."
April 28, 2006 (http://news.com.com/Congress+may+consider+mandatory+ISP+snooping/2100-1028_3-6066608.html): Democrat proposes data retention amendment.
May 16, 2006 (http://news.com.com/Congress+may+make+ISPs+snoop+on+you/2100-1028_3-6072601.html): Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner drafts data retention legislation but backs away from it (http://news.com.com/ISP+snooping+plans+take+backseat/2100-1028_3-6074070.html) two days later.
May 26, 2006 (http://news.com.com/Gonzales+pressures+ISPs+on+data+retention/2100-1028_3-6077654.html): Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller meet with Internet and telecom companies.
October 17, 2006 (http://news.com.com/FBI+director+wants+ISPs+to+track+users/2100-7348_3-6126877.html): FBI director calls for data retention.
January 18, 2007 (http://news.com.com/Attorney+general+to+talk+data+retention+with+new+C ongress/2100-1036_3-6151325.html): Bush administration says it will approach Congress for data retention laws.

The legislative fusillade marks the renewal of a political tussle that began in earnest last April, when Attorney General Alberto Gonzales called on Congress (http://news.com.com/U.S.+attorney+general+calls+for+reasonable+data+re tention/2100-1030_3-6063185.html) to target Internet providers with new regulations, which have been generally opposed by telecommunications companies and civil liberties organizations. CNET News.com was the first to report that the Bush administration has been pushing (http://news.com.com/Your+ISP+as+Net+watchdog/2100-1028_3-5748649.html) for such a rule privately since mid-2005.
Until this week, however, no formal bill had been introduced in the U.S. Congress.
Supporters of the proposal say it's necessary to help track criminals if police don't respond immediately to reports of illegal activity and the relevant logs are deleted by Internet providers. They cite cases of child molestation, for instance. Industry representatives respond by saying there's no evidence that Internet providers have dragged their feet when responding to subpoenas from law enforcement.
Details about data retention requirements would be left to Gonzales. At a minimum, the bill says, the regulations must require storing records "such as the name and address of the subscriber or registered user to whom an Internet Protocol address, user identification or telephone number was assigned, in order to permit compliance with court orders."

Hclinton/Brokenex
February 8th, 2007, 12:19 PM
What does a police state look like?

Grog
February 8th, 2007, 12:22 PM
everyone gets a uniform!

WiGgLr
February 8th, 2007, 12:59 PM
What does a police state look like?

The United Kingdom

Will
February 8th, 2007, 01:02 PM
What does a police state look like?

http://img292.imageshack.us/img292/63/teamamericamoviep03wg9.jpg

Fuck Yeah!

Will
February 8th, 2007, 01:18 PM
http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/807/checkp32tk6.jpghttp://img104.imageshack.us/img104/779/cover3924fd8.jpg
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/7885/inaugurationcheckpointgi9.jpg

http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/4753/checkjpoinmadsc3750rf1.jpg

Victis
February 8th, 2007, 01:55 PM
VISTA CAN SOLVE THIS!

1095
February 8th, 2007, 04:27 PM
Revolution time


That reminds me, one of the few scenes that I enjoyed in V for Vendetta (While the film on the whole didn't impress me) was when Vee fought the cops at the news station.

WiGgLr
February 9th, 2007, 04:07 AM
That reminds me, one of the few scenes that I enjoyed in V for Vendetta (While the film on the whole didn't impress me) was when Vee fought the cops at the news station.

It took me three attempts to watch that film. I kept falling asleep halfway through.

Caddyshack
February 9th, 2007, 05:09 AM
I smell BACON!

http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/807/checkp32tk6.jpghttp://img104.imageshack.us/img104/779/cover3924fd8.jpg
http://img78.imageshack.us/img78/7885/inaugurationcheckpointgi9.jpg

http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/4753/checkjpoinmadsc3750rf1.jpg

Will
February 9th, 2007, 08:43 AM
It took me three attempts to watch that film. I kept falling asleep halfway through.

Still haven't seen it, too busy living it.

1095
February 9th, 2007, 04:58 PM
It took me three attempts to watch that film. I kept falling asleep halfway through.



It was a stupid, tremendously hyped and overrated film, to put it bluntly.

mono
February 9th, 2007, 05:31 PM
I smell BACON!

Is Canada a Police state? :twisted:

Victis
February 11th, 2007, 08:06 PM
LOL